Recent posts

  • Cashing in on the Climate Crisis: climate justice and climate disaster in the Philippines

    The Philippines has become a poster child for vulnerability to climate change. Our islands experience over 20 typhoons a year, making us one of the most if not the most typhoon-exposed country in the world. But nothing could have prepared us for the fury and the devastation brought by Super Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan) that hit […]
    Read more »

  • Paris, the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea

    Where do you stand on the climate change question du jour? Do you think COP 21 in Paris was a success? Or do you think it was a failure? Or are you simply perplexed, wondering why on earth there are such widely differing interpretations in the first place? It’s tempting—depending on your perspective—to blame over-optimistic Candides or doom-and-gloom merchants for spinning the outcome the wrong way. But this curious tension is itself a significant outcome, which is worth looking at in much more detail.
    Read more »

  • The Open Society and its New Enemies

    We live in curious times. We are enduring a series of interconnected global crises, but seem to have lost the will to demand — or even believe in the possibility of — radical change. Banks may crash and jobs melt away, the rich can get richer and the poor poorer. Forests can burn, towns flood, […]
    Read more »

The iron fist of trade liberalisation starts to lose its grip

by Ronnie Hall, Critical Information Collective

The current political turmoil poses both challenges and opportunities for those concerned about the impacts of free trade agreements in the run up to the WTO’s 11th Ministerial Conference, scheduled to be held in Buenos Aires 11-14 December 2017.

Suddenly, following Trump’s election and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) grinding to a halt, Brexit, and considerable uncertainty about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)[1], the iron fist of trade liberalisation seems to be losing its grip.

In fact it can be argued that that grip was previously so rigid, so utterly hegemonic, that only the maddest of people would dare to challenge the status quo. Thus have the critics of globalisation been characterised and (mostly) successfully repressed. Then, enter one Donald Trump, who just doesn’t care and arguably is mad. My view is that trade negotiators have only themselves to blame.

Trade is a hot topic now. It is hard to remember a time over the last 25 years when it was so constantly in the news, with more and more people open to finding out just why free trade agreements are so vehemently opposed by so many people (and indeed what they are)[2].

Although we can’t tell exactly what will happen next, especially with EU elections looming and uncertainty about shifting relationships between the US and other countries, it is still highly likely that the period in the run up to the WTO Ministerial will offer a significant opportunity for communicating more about the negative social and environmental impacts of free trade to a broad swathe of people.

It’s also a fair bet that much of the focus of the Ministerial itself will actually be about the bigger picture, with negotiators defending free trade and railing against the supposed threats of protectionism, rather than wrangling over the usual obscure minutiae of free trade deals. This kind of language has already been emerging from the World Economic Forum’s annual jamboree in Davos in January, and from the WTO’s informal meeting of ministers held there at the same time.

For example, in his personal concluding remarks the chair of the WTO meeting, Johann N. Schneider-Ammann, emphasised that, “Ministers noted that protectionism was not the right answer to anti-trade sentiments and to concerns about technological change. Instead, trade should be made more inclusive and its benefits spread more widely”.[3] This is a good indicator of the broader debate that may be at the forefront of the Argentinean Ministerial, making it an ideal opportunity to speak out about how and why free trade creates such inequalities (and why tweaking national policies isn’t going to stop this).

One critical message has to be this: it is not a case of ‘Trump versus trade’. You don’t have to pick one or the other. If you hate Trump it doesn’t mean you suddenly have to become an ardent supporter of free trade deals. There are other people-friendly alternatives to running our economies and international relationships, built on dignity and equity for all, and respect for our environment. And this, after all, is surely what many of the protest voters in the US and the UK are really looking for. Watch this space!

Click to see references>>


Recent Additions

Real World Radio

Link to us
Link to the Critical Information CollectiveYou can also help us to share information by linking to us on your website. To link with a button like this, click here.

Support us
If you are able to make a financial contribution to help us maintain this site it would be very much appreciated.